Dihexa Research GuideNot a conventional peptide · not fosgonimeton · not FDA-approved
Dihexa (developmental code PNB-0408; also ATH-1001) is an angiotensin IV–derived small-molecule peptidomimetic — chemically N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide / N-(1-oxohexyl)-L-tyrosyl-N-(6-amino-6-oxohexyl)-L-isoleucinamide. It is not a conventional peptide, not angiotensin II, not angiotensin IV, not hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) protein, and not the clinical-stage phosphate prodrug fosgonimeton (ATH-1017 / NDX-1017). English-language evidence that actually names Dihexa is cell and animal. There is no opened human efficacy trial of Dihexa itself and no ClinicalTrials.gov record for dihexa or PNB-0408. Research use only. Not medical advice. Not for human use.
PNB-0408
CAS 1401708-83-5
Preclinical only
Not fosgonimeton
Not FDA-approved
Educational information only. This page describes an investigational laboratory research compound. It is not medical advice. Simple Research Peptides (SRP) materials are for laboratory research only and are not for human or veterinary use, consumption, administration, diagnosis, treatment, or therapeutic application. CAS, UNII, CID, and formula below are taken from opened public registries and primary papers that name Dihexa / N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide / PNB-0408 — not from the SRP product page. No human dosing, reconstitution, or administration protocol appears on this page.
Chemical identity (opened registries only)
SRP product and index pages do not print a sequence, CAS, UNII, molecular formula, or a public COA. Identity below is taken only from opened public registries and primary papers that name Dihexa / N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide / PNB-0408.
One-sentence identity: Dihexa (PNB-0408; also ATH-1001) is an angiotensin IV–derived small-molecule peptidomimetic — N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide. It is not a conventional peptide, not angiotensin II, not angiotensin IV, not HGF protein, and not fosgonimeton. English-language evidence that names Dihexa is cell and animal. There is no opened human efficacy trial of Dihexa itself and no ClinicalTrials.gov record for dihexa or PNB-0408.
| Identifier | Value on opened page | Source opened |
|---|---|---|
| Trade / development names | Dihexa; PNB-0408; ATH-1001; N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide; Hexanoyl-Tyr-Ile-Ahx-NH2 | PubChem CID 129010512; NCATS Inxight UNII 9WYX65A5C2; McCoy 2013 PMID 23055539 |
| SRP listing name | Dihexa (5 mg Capsules, 30 Count) | SRP product page |
| SRP listed strength / format | 5 mg Capsules, 30 Count (lead line: “5 mg each and 30 count”) | SRP product page |
| SRP store / research category | Brain & Mind Research | SRP product page (store taxonomy, not a clinical indication) |
| SRP index listing | “Dihexa (5 mg Capsules, 30 Count)”; Cognitive; “Evidence profile”; evidence tag Preclinical evidence | SRP compound-research-guides index |
| Chemical class | Angiotensin IV–derived small-molecule peptidomimetic (hexanoyl-capped Tyr-Ile plus C-terminal 6-aminohexanamide). Not a conventional peptide. | McCoy 2013 full text; PubChem systematic name; SRP index research-quality note |
| PubChem CID | 129010512. Title: N-(1-Oxohexyl)-L-tyrosyl-N-(6-amino-6-oxohexyl)-L-isoleucinamide | PubChem PUG REST / PUG View, opened 16 August 2026 |
| CAS on CID 129010512 | 1401708-83-5 | PubChem CID 129010512; NCATS Inxight |
| UNII | 9WYX65A5C2 | PubChem CID 129010512; NCATS Inxight |
| Molecular formula / MW | C27H44N4O5; 504.7 g/mol (NCATS: 504.6621) | PubChem CID 129010512; NCATS |
| Exact / monoisotopic mass | 504.33117052 | PubChem PUG property |
| XLogP | 2.3 | PubChem PUG property |
| InChIKey | XEUVNVNAVKZSPT-JTJYXVOQSA-N | PubChem CID 129010512; NCATS |
| IUPAC (computed) | (2S,3S)-N-(6-amino-6-oxohexyl)-2-[[(2S)-2-(hexanoylamino)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoyl]amino]-3-methylpentanamide | PubChem PUG View |
| Systematic / CAS-style name | L-Isoleucinamide, N-(1-oxohexyl)-L-tyrosyl-N-(6-amino-6-oxohexyl)- | PubChem; NCATS |
| NCATS Inxight | DIHEXA; Investigational; Approval Year: Unknown | https://drugs.ncats.io/drug/9WYX65A5C2 |
| EPA DSSTox | DTXSID701032895 | PubChem; NCATS |
| IUPHAR / GtoPdb ligand | No ligand record for Dihexa, PNB-0408, or fosgonimeton (services ligands?name= returned “No ligands found”) |
IUPHAR services API, opened 16 August 2026 |
| IUPHAR receptor class (proposed pathway only) | MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase, target id 1815; Type X RTKs: HGF receptor family; endogenous ligand hepatocyte growth factor; unofficial names include c-Met / HGF receptor. Dihexa is not listed as a ligand on that page. | IUPHAR ObjectDisplay 1815 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (dihexa / PNB-0408 / “N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile”) | 0 studies | CT.gov API v2, opened 16 August 2026 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (fosgonimeton / ATH-1017 / NDX-1017) | 6 studies of a different molecule (see distinction table). Not Dihexa NCTs. | CT.gov API v2, opened 16 August 2026 |
| openFDA Drugs@FDA / labels | No Dihexa match (NOT_FOUND) |
openFDA API, opened 16 August 2026 |
| INN / USAN | None for Dihexa on opened PubChem / NCATS identity fields. Fosgonimeton is the INN/USAN of the phosphate prodrug (PubChem CID 156596375) | PubChem fosgonimeton synonyms |
| FDA-approved product | None. NCATS: Investigational; Approval Year Unknown | NCATS Inxight |
What the molecule actually is. McCoy et al. 2013 (PMID 23055539; PMC 3533412) define Dihexa in words as N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide. The opened PubChem / NCATS names encode the same construct: an N-hexanoyl-L-tyrosine linked to L-isoleucine, capped at the C-terminus with 6-aminohexanamide (Ahx-NH2). That is two coded amino acids plus two non-peptide caps. Native angiotensin IV is the hexapeptide Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe (McCoy abstract: AngIV: VYIHPF). Dihexa keeps only the Tyr-Ile motif from that hexapeptide.
Registry chaos that must not be collapsed.
- NCATS Inxight for UNII 9WYX65A5C2 labels the record DIHEXA and also prints “INN:fosgonimeton [INN]” as a source line and “PRODRUG (METABOLITE ACTIVE)”. Fosgonimeton is a different structure (tyrosine-phenol phosphate; C27H45N4O8P; CID 156596375; CAS 2093305-05-4; UNII H91OA9858J). Do not treat the NCATS “INN:fosgonimeton” string as proof that Dihexa has an INN, and do not treat fosgonimeton NCTs as Dihexa trials.
- NCATS copies Wikipedia-style sentences (HGF binding; “seven orders of magnitude more potent than BDNF”) and a nootropix.com quote. Those NCATS prose blocks were not used as primary findings. The BDNF-potency sentence was not on the opened McCoy 2013 full text.
- A name search for
DIHEXAon the NCATS substances API also returned calcium sorbate (UNII 2P47R6817F). Unused false hit. - Marketplace “peptide” labeling does not change the chemistry. SRP’s own index research-quality note: “Confirm chemical identity because Dihexa is not a conventional peptide despite its derivation.”
Not printed on SRP pages and therefore not claimed as SRP-verified: sequence, CAS, UNII, formula, stereochemistry, or purity numbers. The product page does not print a public COA. SRP itself is a research-material listing, not a Washington State University / M3 Biotechnology / Athira clinical lot.
How it is not a conventional peptide, not angiotensin II / IV, not HGF protein, and not fosgonimeton
This page is Dihexa (PNB-0408) only. Marketplace “nootropic peptide” language is a catalog error, not a chemical classification. Dihexa is not a conventional peptide. Native angiotensin II papers, native angiotensin IV papers, HGF-protein papers, MET-inhibitor oncology papers, and fosgonimeton / ATH-1017 human trials are not Dihexa evidence unless the opened paper actually dosed Dihexa / PNB-0408 / N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide.
| Identity | What opened sources actually describe | Peptide? | Typical literature role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native angiotensin II | Octapeptide Asp-Arg-Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe (class RAS ligand). Not opened here as Dihexa evidence. | Yes (octapeptide) | Pressor / AT1 / AT2 biology |
| Native angiotensin IV | Hexapeptide Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe (AngIV: VYIHPF) | Yes (hexapeptide) | Historical AT4 / procognitive peptide literature. Not Dihexa. |
| Nle1-AngIV | Nle-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro-Phe; McCoy’s parent analog | Yes (hexapeptide analog) | WSU SAR starting point. Benoist 2011 (PMID 21719467) truncates this analog — it does not test Dihexa. |
| Dihexa / PNB-0408 (this page) | N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide; C27H44N4O5; MW ~505 | No — small-molecule peptidomimetic (2 aa + hexanoyl + Ahx-NH2) | McCoy 2013 named lead; later WSU reviews; one independent APP/PS1 mouse paper; one negative 3-NP rat paper |
| HGF protein | Endogenous ligand of MET / c-Met (IUPHAR 1815) | Protein growth factor | Class biology only. An HGF paper is not Dihexa evidence. |
| Fosgonimeton (ATH-1017 / NDX-1017) | O-phosphono tyrosine ester of the same backbone; C27H45N4O8P; MW 584.6; INN/USAN fosgonimeton; UNII H91OA9858J; CAS 2093305-05-4 | Also a small molecule; different formula | Athira / LeonaBio subcutaneous clinical candidate. Human NCTs exist. Not Dihexa. |
Dihexa is not a conventional peptide
A conventional research peptide is a chain of coded amino acids with peptide bonds throughout. Dihexa is a hexanoyl-Tyr-Ile-aminohexanamide. McCoy designed the N-terminal hexanoyl (no N-terminal α-amine) and the C-terminal 6-aminohexanamide specifically to raise hydrophobicity, cut hydrogen bonding, and resist aminopeptidases — the properties native AngIV lacked. Calling the SRP capsule a “peptide” because the catalog sits in a peptide store does not make it AngIV, tesamorelin, or Semax.
Angiotensin II papers are not Dihexa evidence
Ang II, candesartan, ACE-inhibitor, and AT1/AT2 papers were not treated as Dihexa pharmacology unless the opened paper actually dosed Dihexa / PNB-0408. Those molecules are different ligands of a different RAS story.
Angiotensin IV papers are not automatically Dihexa evidence
Benoist 2011 (PMID 21719467) tests C-terminal-truncated Nle1-AngIV fragments (tri- and tetrapeptides). McCoy cites that paper as the SAR step that located activity in Nle-Tyr-Ile. It does not name or dose Dihexa.
HGF / c-Met protein or inhibitor papers are class biology, not Dihexa trials
IUPHAR target 1815 lists hepatocyte growth factor as the endogenous ligand and catalogs MET inhibitors (crizotinib, SGX-523, and others). Those ligands are not Dihexa. MET is a proto-oncogene; opened IUPHAR disease rows include papillary renal-cell carcinoma and pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma. That is the mechanism-based safety question. It is not a Dihexa carcinogenicity study.
Fosgonimeton is a third, clinical-stage molecule. PubChem CID 156596375 is the tyrosine-phenol dihydrogen phosphate of the Dihexa backbone (IUPAC starts “[4-[(2S)-3-[[(2S,3S)-1-[(6-amino-6-oxohexyl)amino]…”). Hua et al. 2022 (PMID 35180125) and NCT03298672 / NCT04488419 / NCT04491006 / NCT04831281 / NCT04886063 / NCT05511558 study fosgonimeton / ATH-1017 / NDX-1017, given subcutaneously. They are not oral Dihexa capsule trials and they do not establish human efficacy of PNB-0408. Those NCTs appear only in the labeled distinction box below. Do not invent a Dihexa NCT.
Proposed mechanism (HGF/c-Met is a hypothesis with a retracted keystone)
Opened primary papers support only a working model. It is not a treatment claim. The highest-cited molecular keystone for “Dihexa = HGF/c-Met potentiator” was retracted in April 2025. Observed means a measurement in an opened, non-retracted Dihexa paper (still read the Notice of Concern on McCoy). Proposed means analogue-design rationale or a hypothesis. Class / adjacent means receptor-class biology or a WSU review. Not shown / retracted means the opened papers did not establish it, or the paper that claimed it was retracted.
Hexanoyl + Ahx-NH2 for stability
Native AngIV and Nle1-AngIV were described as procognitive in earlier WSU work but metabolically fragile and not gut- or BBB-permeant. McCoy shortened the active core to Nle-Tyr-Ile (from Benoist 2011), then replaced the N-terminal residue with a straight-chain hexanoyl (no α-amine) and amidated the C-terminus as 6-aminohexanamide. The paper reports rat-serum half-life 335.5 ± 9.5 min versus 1.42 ± 0.26 min for Nle1-AngIV; low rat-microsome clearance; IV terminal t½ 12.68 days (n = 3; large SEM); IP t½ 8.83 ± 2.41 days; and brain-region concentration of [3H]dihexa above a [14C]inulin vascular marker 30 min after carotid infusion. Those numbers are rat PK from a paper that later received a journal Notice of Concern (PMID 34551989). They are not human PK and they are not SRP-capsule PK. (PMID 23055539.)
Spines and mEPSCs; HGF unpublished
Hippocampal-culture spinogenesis / synaptogenesis at 10−12 M, colocalization with VGLUT1 / synapsin / PSD-95, and a 1.6-fold rise in mEPSC frequency versus vehicle. The discussion states that HGF/c-Met binding was unpublished data at the time (“C. C. Benoist, Kawas LH, and Harding, JW, unpublished data”). McCoy is not a completed HGF-binding paper. It carries a 2021 Notice of Concern and is not a human cognition trial.
Benoist 2014 HGF-dependence paper
Benoist et al. 2014 (PMID 25187433) asserted that Dihexa “binds with high affinity to hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)” and that procognitive / synaptogenic actions required HGF/c-Met. Europe PMC marks that article retracted. The opened retraction notice (PMID 40312093, DOI 10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103567, April 2025) states that, after a Washington State University investigation, Figures 1B, 2A/C, and data in the subsequent erratum submission “have been found to contain falsified and/or fabricated data” and that Leen H. Kawas and Joseph W. Harding were found to be solely responsible. This page does not treat Kd values, c-Met phosphorylation, cell-scattering, or “HGF-antagonist blocks oral Dihexa” claims from that paper as established facts.
Kawas 2012 HGF-antagonist paper
Kawas et al. 2012 (PMID 22129598) described 6-AH family AngIV analogs as HGF-dimerization inhibitors / Met antagonists (including a melanoma-colonization experiment). The opened abstract does not name Dihexa. Europe PMC marks it retracted (notice PMID 40312092). It is logged only so readers do not recycle “AngIV analog = HGF/Met modifier” from a retracted antagonist paper as if it were Dihexa potentiation.
MET is a proto-oncogene (IUPHAR 1815)
IUPHAR MET (1815) is a receptor tyrosine kinase whose endogenous ligand is HGF. Wright & Harding 2015 (PMID 25649658) and Wright, Kawas & Harding 2015 (PMID 25455861) are reviews from the same WSU / M3 Biotechnology authors that present Dihexa as an orally active, BBB-permeant AngIV-based small molecule acting through HGF/c-Met. Those reviews predate the 2025 retractions and cannot repair a retracted primary paper. Sun et al. 2021 (PMID 34827486), an independent APP/PS1 mouse study, reports PI3K/AKT pathway changes after Dihexa and does not itself prove HGF binding.
No HGF isotherm; no human BBB; c-Met is a question
Not shown: a durable, independently replicated human or rodent HGF-binding isotherm for Dihexa; a crystal structure of Dihexa on HGF or MET; proof that an SRP 5 mg capsule matches McCoy’s Harding-lab lot; human BBB penetration; human half-life. MET is a proto-oncogene. Opened IUPHAR pathophysiology rows include hereditary / papillary renal-cell carcinoma and pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma. HGF/c-Met signaling is used in development, tissue repair, and cell growth. A research capsule that is hypothesized to touch that pathway has a mechanism-based oncology question. No opened Dihexa paper is a human cancer-risk trial. The question is unanswered, not disproven. It is not a completed tox package.
Benoist 2011 locates activity in Nle-Tyr-Ile
C-terminal truncated Nle1-AngIV fragments. Distinction only. PMID 21719467.
Kawas 2012: 6-AH family as HGF/Met antagonists
Retracted (notice PMID 40312092). Not Dihexa evidence. PMID 22129598.
McCoy defines Dihexa; HGF binding called unpublished
Rat PK / MWM / spines. Notice of Concern PMID 34551989. Not retracted as of the 2026-08-16 Europe PMC record. PMID 23055539.
Benoist 2014 claimed HGF/c-Met dependence
WSU investigation: Figs 1B, 2A/C and erratum data falsified/fabricated; Kawas and Harding solely responsible. Not used as mechanism fact. PMID 25187433; notice PMID 40312093.
Wright & Harding reviews cannot repair a retracted keystone
Secondary. Same WSU / M3 authors. PMIDs 25649658 and 25455861.
Sun APP/PS1 mice (mixed methods route); Wells 3-NP rats negative
Sun PMID 34827486. Wells PMID 38489193: PNB-0408 did not protect.